![]() |
|
|||||||||
ColorMunki: More Fun Than a Barrel of Spectrophotometers, ColorMunki has a funny Web 2.0 sort of name, like flickr, kuler or YouTube. It’s a name that implies Continuing on that analogy a little more, ColorMunki attempts to provide the quality of an interstellar telescope with the straightforward simplicity of a rolled up newspaper. This balance is noticeable in every aspect of ColorMunki, and its form and function are full of clever solutions to the problems of packing so many high-end features into such a simple device. Screen Calibration Just like any display colorimeter, ColorMunki hangs over your screen and measures the accuracy of a series of displayed colors. The software produces a profile based on this measurement, compensating for irregularities. ColorMunki’s handling of this is extremely straightforward. While the Advanced mode factors in your monitor’s brightness and contrast and the ambient light in your room, you won’t find the numerous variable settings that are present in upper-tier systems. Based on the tests I ran on screens including Samsung, Acer, Sceptre, LG, Apple and laptop displays, ColorMunki produced very consistent neutral tones across a number of different combinations. Neutral tones matched between monitors to a degree that I haven’t seen some other systems achieve. ColorMunki is exactly what you expect out of a screen calibration device. No quality compromises have been made in the streamlining process. However, keep in mind that profiles can only do so much. If you’re doing serious photo editing, you need a top tier monitor to get your display as close to the real world source and printing result as possible. Design
Printer Profiling Now, the really unusual part: to measure the test charts, you briskly run the device across several strips of patches. Considering the traditional method, it’s pretty astonishing that this works. Once you get the feel for the pacing, it’s pretty smooth. But it’s a little tricky at first. While the software lets you know if your scan worked or not, there’s no notation of what causes failed scans. Guess-and-test gets you through, but this is a case where a more technical explanation could actually make the process easier. The final profiles are quite good, though. Again, that the ColorMunki’s approach works at all is pretty astonishing, and prints made with this simple profiling compare favorably to manufacturers’ profiles on most photos. Of course, this also means you'll be able to produce high quality profiles even when manufacturer's profiles don't exist, whether that's because of a new paper or less common printer. If colors in an image don’t replicate correctly, you can enhance the profile. Using your own photos to generate these enhancing test charts, the ColorMunki software gives you very precise color reproduction for your images. While a lab servicing a wide variety of professionals would likely want the extra long-term efficiency and range of precision provided by a traditional profiling system, there is something to be said for fine-tuning a profile with a client’s image.
ColorPicker When I tested this using coated Pantone guides, ColorMunki was able to pin the colors down within a few RGB digits. Uncoated guides varied to a much greater degree. While ColorMunki was able to distinguish that reddish-brown was reddish-brown, it wasn’t able to pinpoint the precise Pantone value. As you’d expect, real world materials ranging from skin to a chrome blue computer were pulled with varying accuracy depending on the surface. Even though ColorPicker can be quite accurate, it’s probably not consistent enough for critical measurements (e.g. fashion designers looking for precise color matches Troubleshooting Other Features Conclusion |
||||||||||